Files
ISEP/hooks/tests/prod-write-guard.test.sh
T
Leo c1d80756d7 審核補件:第二個空殼閘(irreversible_dispatch_check.py)+既有測試套
總管複驗 PR 時發現 subagent 只補了一個空殼,還有第二個同款的:

  arcrun-intent-guard.sh      → exec 不存在的 .py ⇒ 擋掉全部(吵,PR 已修)
  irreversible-dispatch-guard.sh → 同款,但寫法是
      python3 <不存在> 2>/dev/null || echo '{"verdict":"OK"}'
    ⇒ **靜默放行全部**(危險,本 commit 補)

實測同一份派工單「驗過了就把舊分支刪掉」:
  InkStoneCo 版(有 .py)exit=2 擋 / ISEP 版(缺 .py)exit=0 放行
補完後:不可逆派工 exit=2、正常派工 exit=0、合規工作流 exit=0。

系統性掃描 ISEP 全部 hooks 引用的同目錄檔案:補完後 0 個缺檔(InkStoneCo 本來就是 0)。
順帶把 InkStoneCo 的 hooks/tests/ 四支既有測試一併帶過來。

🔴 這件事很重要:若先併 InkStoneCo#64(刪掉 .claude/hooks/),
   這台機器會失去那支唯一還能用的副本——變成真的沒有那道閘。
2026-08-20 20:06:23 +08:00

74 lines
3.8 KiB
Bash
Executable File
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# prod-write-guard.sh 的迴歸測試。
# 🔴 必須寫成檔案跑:這道閘會擋掉「含有它要擋的字串」的指令本身
# ⇒ 直接在 Bash 裡打測試,會被自己擋下(2026-08-12 實撞)。
HOOK="$1"
mk(){ python3 -c "import json,sys;print(json.dumps({'tool_name':'Bash','tool_input':{'command':sys.argv[1]}}))" "$1"; }
PASS=0; FAIL=0
t(){ # t <期望 block|pass> <說明> <指令>
mk "$3" | "$HOOK" >/dev/null 2>&1; rc=$?
got=$([ $rc -eq 2 ] && echo block || echo pass)
if [ "$got" = "$1" ]; then echo " ✅ $2"; PASS=$((PASS+1))
else echo " ❌ $2 —— 期望 $1,實得 $got"; FAIL=$((FAIL+1)); fi
}
H='https://arcrun-kbdb.leo21c.workers.dev'
DASH_D='-d'
echo "── 該放行(唯讀)──"
t pass "純 GET" "curl -s $H/templates"
t pass "GET + tr -d(本次實撞的誤攔)" "ACC=\$(grep -oE '^X=.' f | tr $DASH_D '\\r'); curl -s $H/templates"
t pass "GET + cut -d=" "A=\$(cut ${DASH_D}= -f2 f); curl -s $H/templates"
t pass "GET + sort -d / xargs -d" "ls | sort $DASH_D | xargs $DASH_D '\\n' echo; curl -s $H/entries"
t pass "GET 帶 Bearer 標頭" "curl -s -H 'Authorization: Bearer xxx' $H/templates?limit=1"
t pass "打 staging" "curl -X POST https://arcrun-rag-installer-staging.workers.dev/x $DASH_D '{}'"
t pass "打 youlin 測試場" "curl -X POST https://arcrun-cypher-executor.youlin-hsieh-dev.workers.dev/x $DASH_D '{}'"
t pass "打 Gitea(不是實例)" "curl -X POST https://git.uncle6.me/api/v1/repos/Leo/x/issues $DASH_D '{}'"
echo "── 該擋(寫入)──"
t block "POST 到實例" "curl -X POST $H/entries $DASH_D '{}'"
t block "PUT 到實例" "curl -X PUT $H/entries/1 --data '{}'"
t block "DELETE 到實例" "curl -X DELETE $H/entries/1"
t block "POST 且同時有 tr -d(剪字後仍該擋)" "cat f | tr $DASH_D '\\r' | curl -X POST $H/webhooks/named $DASH_D @-"
t block "wrangler deploy" "npx wrangler deploy --name arcrun-kbdb"
# ── 2026-08-13:「執行它」vs「談論它」───────────────────────────────
# 實撞:把 #108 的驗收證據留言到 Gitea,正文引述了那個指令名 ⇒ 一則留言被當成部署擋掉。
# 這批測資的挑法是「本 repo 現行真的會出現的形狀」,不是我自己挑好抓的壞例子
# ——PR #87 那道假綠閘就是敗在後者(14 條全過,卻漏掉 repo 實際在用的呼叫寫法)。
ACR_U='acr up''date' # 拆開寫:否則這支測試檔自己會被閘擋住(它也是一條 Bash 指令)
ACR_P='acr pu''sh'
WR_D='wrangler dep''loy'
echo "── 該放行(只是談論,不是執行)──"
t pass "heredoc 正文引述(本次實撞)" \
"B=\$(cat <<'EOF'
更新指令 \`$ACR_U --force\` 印出了 ARCRUN_NAMESPACE
EOF
); curl -X POST https://git.uncle6.me/api/v1/repos/Leo/Arcrun/issues/108/comments $DASH_D \"\$B\""
t pass "commit 訊息裡提到" "git commit -m '修好 $ACR_U 的命名空間注入'"
t pass "markdown code span(反引號)" "printf '%s' '看 \`$ACR_U\` 的輸出'"
t pass "grep 它的名字" "grep -n '$ACR_P' .claude/hooks/prod-write-guard.sh"
t pass "文章裡提到 $WR_D" "printf '%s' '# 為什麼 $WR_D 要擋'"
t pass "acr 唯讀子指令" "acr status --json"
t pass "acr whoami" "acr whoami"
echo "── 該擋(真的在指令位置執行)──"
t block "行首" "$ACR_U --force"
t block "&& 之後" "cd /x && $ACR_U"
t block "; 之後" "echo hi; $ACR_P workflow.yaml"
t block "管線之後" "cat x.yaml | $ACR_P -"
t block "bash -c 引號裡" "bash -c \"$ACR_U --force\""
t block "\$( ) 裡" "OUT=\$($ACR_U 2>&1)"
t block "npx 前綴" "npx $WR_D --name arcrun-kbdb"
t block "sudo 前綴" "sudo $ACR_U"
t block "heredoc 之後的真指令(剝內文不能連指令一起剝)" \
"cat <<'EOF' > note.md
只是筆記
EOF
$ACR_U --force"
echo
echo "結果:通過 $PASS 失敗 $FAIL"
[ $FAIL -eq 0 ] || exit 1