/** * portal-auth P2 測試(design §2/§4/§5,Gitea #24/#25) * * 覆蓋(=tasks.md P2 測試項): * 1. KDF:pbkdf2-sha256$100000$… 格式(CF Workers runtime 上限 100k,2026-07-14 真雲實撞)、 * 驗證對錯、壞格式誠實 false、600k 舊 hash 相容(迭代數從儲存值解析) * 2. bootstrap 閘:無 console session → 401;建 admin 寫進**認證儲存**(D61); * 已有 admin → 409 * 3. 登入對錯:成功發 token(回應**無租戶字串**)、密碼錯 401、停用 403、未知 email 401 * 4. 節流:5 次失敗 → 429(KV TTL 計數) * 5. session:每請求回讀 record;停用即拒(既有 session 立即失效) * 6. 改密碼:驗舊密;新 hash 以 100k 格式落 slot * 7. role 閘:非 admin 打 admin 端點 → 403;admin 列表**剝除 password_hash** * * D61(ADR D61 / Leo/arcrun-rag#55)補的覆蓋(原本沒有,這次變更的重點): * 8. 整台實例沒有任何認證資料 → 登入回「讀不到認證資料」(不是密碼錯),且不計入鎖定 * 9. 舊實例相容:帳號只存在 KBDB(舊家)時仍登得進去,登入成功後自動搬進認證儲存 * * KBDB 打 fetchMock 假 host(wrangler.test.toml KBDB_BASE_URL=https://kbdb.test)+ * disableNetConnect——絕不外連。子 namespace 隔離的「搜 email 搜不到」由本機雙 worker * 端到端 curl 驗證(PR 驗收證據表),這裡驗「寫入時 owner_id=leo::portal」的機械事實。 * * D61 起,帳號的家從 KBDB 換成認證儲存(CF Workers Secrets)——寫入會呼叫 * `https://api.cloudflare.com/.../secrets`(PUT),同樣走 fetchMock 假 host 攔截,不外連。 * wrangler.test.toml 已預設 CF_SECRETS_API_TOKEN/CF_ACCOUNT_ID 就緒(比照真實裝妥的實例)。 */ import { SELF, env, fetchMock } from 'cloudflare:test'; import { beforeAll, beforeEach, afterEach, describe, it, expect } from 'vitest'; import { hashPassword, verifyPassword, PBKDF2_ITERATIONS } from '../src/lib/portal-auth'; import { PORTAL_TEMPLATE_SEEDS } from '../src/lib/portal-seeds'; import { AUTH_ID_PREFIX } from '../src/lib/portal-auth-store'; import { portalRouter } from '../src/routes/portal'; import type { Bindings, ExecutionContext } from '../src/types'; const KBDB = 'https://kbdb.test'; const CF_API = 'https://api.cloudflare.com'; const NS = 'leo::portal'; // wrangler.test.toml CONSOLE_TENANT=leo → 子 namespace const EMAIL = 'user@example.com'; const PASSWORD = 'correct-horse-9'; // 測試用低迭代 hash(verify 從儲存格式解析 iterations → 舊/低參數 hash 也驗得動=漸進遷移特性) let storedHash: string; beforeAll(async () => { fetchMock.activate(); fetchMock.disableNetConnect(); storedHash = await hashPassword(PASSWORD, 10_000); }); afterEach(() => fetchMock.assertNoPendingInterceptors()); function json(method: string, path: string, body?: unknown, headers: Record = {}) { return SELF.fetch(`http://localhost${path}`, { method, headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json', ...headers }, body: body === undefined ? undefined : JSON.stringify(body), }); } /** * D61:認證儲存的寫入路徑(單元測試層級——一次呼叫=一片,測試資料量小不會觸發溢位分片)。 * 攔截 CF Workers Scripts secrets 管理 API 的 PUT,捕捉 body 供斷言(片名/內容)。 * 用法:每個會觸發寫入的測試呼叫一次,回傳的 `puts()` 拿到依序捕捉到的 {name, text}[]。 * * ⚠️ 讀路徑沒有對應的「seed 進 env」捷徑可用:`cloudflare:test` 的 `env` 物件是傳給 * `vitest` 主 context 用的,對 `SELF.fetch()` 打的那個 worker isolate **不生效**(實測驗證, * mutate `env.XXX` 後 SELF 端讀到的仍是 wrangler.test.toml 的原值)。因此「舊實例相容」 * 一類的讀路徑測試,一律靠**既有的 KBDB fetchMock**(新家預設空,天然等於「帳號只在舊家」); * 要驗證「新家已經有資料」則靠**真的呼叫一次寫入端點**(bootstrap/新增同仁),讓 portal-auth-store * 模組內的 per-isolate overlay 落地——這個 overlay 在同一支測試檔案裡的後續測試\*也讀得到\* * (模組級全域變數不隨 test 重置,只有 KV/D1 等 storage 才有 isolatedStorage 重置), * 這是刻意善用而非意外:想要「乾淨無帳號」的情境,該測試必須排在檔案裡**第一個寫入動作之前**。 */ function mockAuthStoreWrite(times = 1): { puts: () => Array<{ name: string; text: string }> } { const captured: Array<{ name: string; text: string }> = []; fetchMock .get(CF_API) .intercept({ path: (p: string) => p.includes('/secrets'), method: 'PUT' }) .reply(200, (opts) => { const body = JSON.parse(String(opts.body)) as { name: string; text: string }; captured.push(body); return { success: true }; }) .times(times); return { puts: () => captured }; } // ── KBDB mock helpers ────────────────────────────────────────────────────── /** head entry 查找(GET /entries?page_name=…&entry_type=portal_user&owner_id=ns&limit=1) */ function mockHeadLookup(email: string, recordId: string | null) { const needle = new URLSearchParams({ page_name: email }).toString(); fetchMock .get(KBDB) .intercept({ path: (p: string) => p.startsWith('/entries?') && p.includes(needle) && p.includes(encodeURIComponent(NS)), method: 'GET', }) .reply(200, { success: true, entries: recordId ? [{ content: recordId }] : [], count: recordId ? 1 : 0, total: recordId ? 1 : 0 }); } function mockGetRecord(recordId: string, values: Record) { fetchMock .get(KBDB) .intercept({ path: `/records/${recordId}`, method: 'GET' }) .reply(200, { success: true, record: { record_id: recordId, template_id: 'tpl_pu', values } }); } function mockListByTemplate(template: string, records: { record_id: string; values: Record }[]) { fetchMock .get(KBDB) .intercept({ path: (p: string) => p.startsWith(`/records/by-template/${template}`), method: 'GET' }) .reply(200, { success: true, records: records.map((r) => ({ ...r, template_id: 'tpl' })), count: records.length }); } function mockTemplatesExist() { for (const name of ['portal_user', 'portal_library', 'triplet']) { fetchMock .get(KBDB) .intercept({ path: `/templates/${name}`, method: 'GET' }) .reply(200, { success: true, template: { id: `tpl-${name}`, name } }); } } function activeUserValues(overrides: Record = {}): Record { return { email: EMAIL, display_name: '測試同仁', status: 'active', role: 'user', password_hash: storedHash, libraries: '["general","finance"]', created_at: '2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z', updated_at: '2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z', ...overrides, }; } async function seedPortalSession(token: string, recordId: string) { await env.SESSIONS_KV.put(`portal_sess:${token}`, JSON.stringify({ record_id: recordId })); } // ═══════════════ 1. KDF 單元 ═══════════════ describe('PBKDF2 模組(lib/portal-auth)', () => { it('hashPassword 預設格式 = pbkdf2-sha256$100000$salt$hash(CF runtime 上限),且驗證通過', async () => { const h = await hashPassword('some-password-123'); const parts = h.split('$'); expect(parts.length).toBe(4); expect(parts[0]).toBe('pbkdf2-sha256'); expect(parts[1]).toBe(String(PBKDF2_ITERATIONS)); // CF Workers 正式 runtime PBKDF2 封頂 100k(600k 在真雲 deriveBits 直接拒絕 → bootstrap 500) expect(PBKDF2_ITERATIONS).toBe(100_000); expect(PBKDF2_ITERATIONS).toBeLessThanOrEqual(100_000); expect(await verifyPassword('some-password-123', h)).toBe(true); expect(await verifyPassword('wrong-password-x', h)).toBe(false); }); it('600k 舊 hash 相容:verify 從儲存值解析迭代數,仍驗得動(miniflare 無平台上限可造)', async () => { // 誠實註:此相容性在 miniflare / 未來平台放寬時成立;真 CF runtime 對 deriveBits 一律封頂 // 100k,600k hash 在真雲仍會被拒——但真雲 bootstrap 本身就 500,雲端不存在 600k hash,無遷移面。 const legacy = await hashPassword(PASSWORD, 600_000); expect(legacy.startsWith('pbkdf2-sha256$600000$')).toBe(true); expect(await verifyPassword(PASSWORD, legacy)).toBe(true); expect(await verifyPassword('wrong-password-x', legacy)).toBe(false); }); it('壞格式 / 前綴不認得 / 被竄改 → false(誠實拒絕不拋錯)', async () => { expect(await verifyPassword('x', '')).toBe(false); expect(await verifyPassword('x', 'bcrypt$10$abc$def')).toBe(false); expect(await verifyPassword('x', 'pbkdf2-sha256$notanumber$AA$BB')).toBe(false); const tampered = storedHash.slice(0, -4) + 'AAA='; expect(await verifyPassword(PASSWORD, tampered)).toBe(false); }); }); // ═══════════════ 1.5 D61:整台實例沒有任何認證資料 ═══════════════ // // 🔴 這個 describe 必須留在檔案裡「第一個會寫入認證儲存的測試」之前(下面 2. bootstrap // 的「console session OK」那則)——見 mockAuthStoreWrite 檔頭註解:portal-auth-store.ts // 的 per-isolate overlay 是模組級全域變數,同一支測試檔案跑起來不會在測試之間重置, // 一旦有測試寫入過,後面的測試都會看到那筆資料,「乾淨無帳號」的前提就不成立了。 describe('D61:整台實例沒有任何認證資料(arcrun-rag#55,leo 2026-08-09 被誤鎖 15 分鐘的事故)', () => { it('登入回「讀不到認證資料」而不是「密碼錯誤」,且不計入失敗鎖定', async () => { // 新家(overlay/env bag)此刻還是空的(本測試特意排在任何寫入測試之前); // 舊家(KBDB)也回空——head lookup 查無此人+by-template 列表也空,兩邊都沒有帳號, // 才是「這台實例真的沒有認證資料」。 mockHeadLookup('anyone@example.com', null); mockListByTemplate('portal_user', []); const res = await json('POST', '/portal/login', { email: 'anyone@example.com', password: 'whatever-pw-1' }); expect(res.status).toBe(503); const data = (await res.json()) as { error: string; code: string; auth_store: { present: boolean; users: number } }; expect(data.code).toBe('auth_store_empty'); // 分得出來的錯:這句要誠實講「不是密碼錯」,而且**不能**是密碼錯誤那句通用訊息 // (文案含混是 leo 被鎖 15 分鐘的根因——他的密碼從頭到尾是對的)。 expect(data.error).toContain('不是密碼錯'); expect(data.error).not.toBe('email 或密碼錯誤'); // 不是密碼錯誤路徑用的那句通用訊息 expect(data.auth_store.users).toBe(0); // 不計入鎖定:lockfail 計數器完全沒被寫入 expect(await env.SESSIONS_KV.get('portal_lockfail:anyone@example.com')).toBeNull(); }); }); // ═══════════════ 2. bootstrap 閘 ═══════════════ describe('POST /portal/admin/bootstrap', () => { it('無 console owner session → 401,不碰 KBDB', async () => { const res = await json('POST', '/portal/admin/bootstrap', { email: 'a@b.co', password: 'longenough' }); expect(res.status).toBe(401); }); it('console session OK → 建第一個 admin:寫進認證儲存(D61,不再落 KBDB)', async () => { await env.SESSIONS_KV.put('console_sess:owner-token', JSON.stringify({ created_at: Date.now() })); mockTemplatesExist(); mockListByTemplate('portal_user', []); // 尚無 admin(新家空,舊家也空) mockHeadLookup('admin@example.com', null); // email 未占用(新家找不到 → 回退查舊家) const { puts } = mockAuthStoreWrite(); const res = await json( 'POST', '/portal/admin/bootstrap', { email: 'Admin@Example.com', password: 'bootstrap-pw-1', display_name: '管理員' }, { Authorization: 'Bearer owner-token' }, ); expect(res.status).toBe(200); const data = (await res.json()) as Record; expect(data.success).toBe(true); expect(typeof data.record_id).toBe('string'); expect((data.record_id as string).startsWith(AUTH_ID_PREFIX)).toBe(true); // 住新家(D61) expect(data.email).toBe('admin@example.com'); // 存小寫(design §2.1) // D61:一次寫入=一片,落進認證儲存(Workers Secrets),不再有 KBDB record/head entry const shards = puts(); expect(shards.length).toBe(1); expect(shards[0].name).toBe('ARCRUN_AUTH_STORE'); const shard = JSON.parse(shards[0].text) as { users: Array<{ email: string; role: string; status: string; libraries: string[]; password_hash: string }>; }; expect(shard.users.length).toBe(1); const stored = shard.users[0]; expect(stored.email).toBe('admin@example.com'); expect(stored.role).toBe('admin'); expect(stored.status).toBe('active'); expect(stored.libraries).toEqual(['*']); expect(stored.password_hash.startsWith(`pbkdf2-sha256$${PBKDF2_ITERATIONS}$`)).toBe(true); expect(shards[0].text).not.toContain('bootstrap-pw-1'); // 明碼絕不落地 }); it('已有 admin → 409 拒絕重複 bootstrap', async () => { await env.SESSIONS_KV.put('console_sess:owner-token', JSON.stringify({ created_at: Date.now() })); mockTemplatesExist(); mockListByTemplate('portal_user', [{ record_id: 'rec_a', values: activeUserValues({ role: 'admin' }) }]); const res = await json( 'POST', '/portal/admin/bootstrap', { email: 'x@y.co', password: 'whatever-123' }, { Authorization: 'Bearer owner-token' }, ); expect(res.status).toBe(409); }); }); // ═══════════════ 3. 登入對錯 ═══════════════ describe('POST /portal/login', () => { // 🔴 這一區塊全部共用 EMAIL/'rec_1' 這組舊家 fixture(原本就是),**故意不**在這裡驗證 // 「登入成功後搬進新家」——promoteLegacyUser 一旦真的寫成功,會把 EMAIL 留進 overlay, // 而 overlay 是模組級全域、同檔案後面的測試都讀得到,會讓後面每一則「查 KBDB 的 EMAIL」 // 全部改成「命中新家」而跳過 KBDB mock,導致假性的 pending-interceptor 骨牌。 // 搬遷本身的驗證另開一組使用**專屬、不共用**email 的 describe(見檔案最後 // 「D61:舊實例登入自癒」),避免污染這裡的既有 fixture。 it('成功:發 session token;回 display_name/role/libraries;**無任何租戶字串欄位**', async () => { mockHeadLookup(EMAIL, 'rec_1'); mockGetRecord('rec_1', activeUserValues()); const res = await json('POST', '/portal/login', { email: EMAIL, password: PASSWORD }); expect(res.status).toBe(200); const data = (await res.json()) as Record; expect(data.success).toBe(true); expect(typeof data.session_token).toBe('string'); expect(data.display_name).toBe('測試同仁'); expect(data.role).toBe('user'); expect(data.libraries).toEqual(['general', 'finance']); expect('tenant' in data).toBe(false); // design §3.3:Portal 絕不下發租戶字串 expect(JSON.stringify(data)).not.toContain('leo'); // 連值都不含租戶字串 const sess = await env.SESSIONS_KV.get(`portal_sess:${data.session_token}`); expect(sess).toBeTruthy(); expect((JSON.parse(sess!) as { record_id: string }).record_id).toBe('rec_1'); // 只存 record_id // D61:promoteLegacyUser 的實際寫入嘗試沒有掛 CF API mock,disableNetConnect 之下 // 該次 fetch 會失敗,但函式本身 best-effort 吞掉(見 portal.ts promoteLegacyUser 的 // try/catch)——這正是要驗的事:搬不動不影響本次登入已經成功這件事實(上面兩個 // expect 已經成立)。afterEach 的 assertNoPendingInterceptors 只檢查「有登記但沒用到」 // 的 mock,一次沒登記過 mock 的失敗呼叫不算數,故這裡不需要(也不能)額外掛 CF API mock。 }); it('密碼錯 → 401 通用訊息+lockfail 計數 +1', async () => { mockHeadLookup(EMAIL, 'rec_1'); mockGetRecord('rec_1', activeUserValues()); const res = await json('POST', '/portal/login', { email: EMAIL, password: 'wrong-password' }); expect(res.status).toBe(401); const raw = await env.SESSIONS_KV.get(`portal_lockfail:${EMAIL}`); expect(raw).toBeTruthy(); expect((JSON.parse(raw!) as { count: number }).count).toBe(1); }); it('未知 email → 401 同樣通用訊息(不洩帳號存在性)', async () => { mockHeadLookup('ghost@example.com', null); const res = await json('POST', '/portal/login', { email: 'ghost@example.com', password: 'whatever-123' }); expect(res.status).toBe(401); const data = (await res.json()) as { error: string }; expect(data.error).toBe('email 或密碼錯誤'); }); it('停用帳號 → 403(正確密碼也拒)', async () => { mockHeadLookup(EMAIL, 'rec_1'); mockGetRecord('rec_1', activeUserValues({ status: 'disabled' })); const res = await json('POST', '/portal/login', { email: EMAIL, password: PASSWORD }); expect(res.status).toBe(403); }); it('節流:計數達 5 → 429,不碰 KBDB;正確密碼也擋', async () => { await env.SESSIONS_KV.put(`portal_lockfail:${EMAIL}`, JSON.stringify({ count: 5 }), { expirationTtl: 900 }); const res = await json('POST', '/portal/login', { email: EMAIL, password: PASSWORD }); expect(res.status).toBe(429); }); it('第 5 次失敗後下一次直接 429(KV 計數累加)', async () => { await env.SESSIONS_KV.put(`portal_lockfail:${EMAIL}`, JSON.stringify({ count: 4 }), { expirationTtl: 900 }); mockHeadLookup(EMAIL, 'rec_1'); mockGetRecord('rec_1', activeUserValues()); const res5 = await json('POST', '/portal/login', { email: EMAIL, password: 'wrong-again' }); expect(res5.status).toBe(401); const res6 = await json('POST', '/portal/login', { email: EMAIL, password: PASSWORD }); expect(res6.status).toBe(429); // 第 6 次不再打 KBDB(無 pending interceptor 可證) }); }); // ═══════════════ 4. session 回讀(真相源=record)═══════════════ describe('GET /portal/session', () => { it('有效 session → 回 display_name/role/libraries,無租戶字串', async () => { await seedPortalSession('tok-1', 'rec_1'); mockGetRecord('rec_1', activeUserValues()); // P3:session 多回 graph_allowed(D-4)——非 ["*"] 用戶要查庫目錄算 graph 來源庫 mockListByTemplate('portal_library', []); const res = await json('GET', '/portal/session', undefined, { Authorization: 'Bearer tok-1' }); expect(res.status).toBe(200); const data = (await res.json()) as Record; expect(data.valid).toBe(true); expect(data.libraries).toEqual(['general', 'finance']); expect('tenant' in data).toBe(false); // P3 能力欄位:來源庫預設 general、本用戶有 general → graph 放行;workflows 預設 admin-only expect(data.graph_allowed).toBe(true); expect(data.workflows_visible).toBe(false); }); it('帳號被停用 → 既有 session 立即失效(403)且 KV session 被清', async () => { await seedPortalSession('tok-2', 'rec_1'); mockGetRecord('rec_1', activeUserValues({ status: 'disabled' })); const res = await json('GET', '/portal/session', undefined, { Authorization: 'Bearer tok-2' }); expect(res.status).toBe(403); expect(await env.SESSIONS_KV.get('portal_sess:tok-2')).toBeNull(); }); it('無 token / 壞 token → 401', async () => { expect((await json('GET', '/portal/session')).status).toBe(401); expect((await json('GET', '/portal/session', undefined, { Authorization: 'Bearer nope' })).status).toBe(401); }); }); // ═══════════════ 5. 改自己密碼 ═══════════════ describe('POST /portal/me/password', () => { it('舊密碼錯 → 401,不發 PATCH', async () => { await seedPortalSession('tok-3', 'rec_1'); mockGetRecord('rec_1', activeUserValues()); const res = await json( 'POST', '/portal/me/password', { current: 'wrong-old', new: 'new-password-1' }, { Authorization: 'Bearer tok-3' }, ); expect(res.status).toBe(401); }); it('舊密碼對 → PATCH 新 hash(現行 100k 格式、非明碼、與舊 hash 不同)', async () => { await seedPortalSession('tok-4', 'rec_1'); mockGetRecord('rec_1', activeUserValues()); let patched = ''; fetchMock .get(KBDB) .intercept({ path: '/records/rec_1', method: 'PATCH' }) .reply(200, (opts) => { patched = String(opts.body); return { success: true, record: { record_id: 'rec_1', template_id: 'tpl_pu', values: activeUserValues() } }; }); const res = await json( 'POST', '/portal/me/password', { current: PASSWORD, new: 'brand-new-pw-1' }, { Authorization: 'Bearer tok-4' }, ); expect(res.status).toBe(200); const sent = JSON.parse(patched) as { values: Record }; expect(sent.values.password_hash.startsWith(`pbkdf2-sha256$${PBKDF2_ITERATIONS}$`)).toBe(true); expect(sent.values.password_hash).not.toBe(storedHash); expect(patched).not.toContain('brand-new-pw-1'); // 明碼不落 KBDB }); }); // ═══════════════ 6. role 閘+admin 列表剝敏 ═══════════════ describe('admin 端點 role 閘', () => { it('一般 user 打 GET /portal/admin/users → 403', async () => { await seedPortalSession('tok-5', 'rec_1'); mockGetRecord('rec_1', activeUserValues({ role: 'user' })); const res = await json('GET', '/portal/admin/users', undefined, { Authorization: 'Bearer tok-5' }); expect(res.status).toBe(403); }); it('admin 列表 → 200 且**每筆都不含 password_hash**', async () => { await seedPortalSession('tok-6', 'rec_admin'); mockGetRecord('rec_admin', activeUserValues({ role: 'admin', email: 'admin@example.com' })); mockListByTemplate('portal_user', [ { record_id: 'rec_admin', values: activeUserValues({ role: 'admin', email: 'admin@example.com' }) }, { record_id: 'rec_1', values: activeUserValues() }, ]); const res = await json('GET', '/portal/admin/users', undefined, { Authorization: 'Bearer tok-6' }); expect(res.status).toBe(200); const data = (await res.json()) as { users: Record[] }; expect(data.users.length).toBe(2); for (const u of data.users) { expect('password_hash' in u).toBe(false); expect(Array.isArray(u.libraries)).toBe(true); } expect(JSON.stringify(data)).not.toContain('pbkdf2-sha256'); // 整包回應無雜湊外洩 }); it('admin 停用同仁:PATCH status=disabled → 經 head entry 成員驗證後改 record', async () => { await seedPortalSession('tok-7', 'rec_admin'); mockGetRecord('rec_admin', activeUserValues({ role: 'admin', email: 'admin@example.com' })); mockGetRecord('rec_1', activeUserValues()); // assertPortalUserRecord 回讀目標 mockHeadLookup(EMAIL, 'rec_1'); // head 指回同 record → 成員資格成立 let patched = ''; fetchMock .get(KBDB) .intercept({ path: '/records/rec_1', method: 'PATCH' }) .reply(200, (opts) => { patched = String(opts.body); return { success: true, record: { record_id: 'rec_1', template_id: 'tpl_pu', values: activeUserValues({ status: 'disabled' }) }, }; }); const res = await json( 'PATCH', '/portal/admin/users/rec_1', { status: 'disabled' }, { Authorization: 'Bearer tok-7' }, ); expect(res.status).toBe(200); const sent = JSON.parse(patched) as { values: Record }; expect(sent.values.status).toBe('disabled'); const data = (await res.json()) as { user: { status: string } }; expect(data.user.status).toBe('disabled'); }); it('head entry 指向別的 record(成員資格不符)→ 404 不 PATCH', async () => { await seedPortalSession('tok-8', 'rec_admin'); mockGetRecord('rec_admin', activeUserValues({ role: 'admin', email: 'admin@example.com' })); mockGetRecord('rec_evil', activeUserValues({ email: EMAIL })); mockHeadLookup(EMAIL, 'rec_1'); // head 指 rec_1 ≠ rec_evil const res = await json( 'PATCH', '/portal/admin/users/rec_evil', { status: 'disabled' }, { Authorization: 'Bearer tok-8' }, ); expect(res.status).toBe(404); }); }); // ═══════════════ t130 — triplet template seed ═══════════════ describe('t130 — triplet template seed(PORTAL_TEMPLATE_SEEDS 補 triplet,ensurePortalTemplates 冪等)', () => { it('PORTAL_TEMPLATE_SEEDS 含 triplet 且必要 slots 齊備(pure data)', () => { const seed = PORTAL_TEMPLATE_SEEDS.find((s) => s.name === 'triplet'); expect(seed).toBeDefined(); for (const slot of ['subject', 'predicate', 'object', 'source_uri', 'status', 'library']) { expect(seed!.slots).toContain(slot); } }); it('POST /init/seed — triplet 已存 → existing(冪等,不重建)', async () => { for (const name of ['portal_user', 'portal_library', 'triplet']) { fetchMock .get(KBDB) .intercept({ path: `/templates/${name}`, method: 'GET' }) .reply(200, { success: true, template: { id: `tpl-${name}`, name } }); } const res = await SELF.fetch('http://localhost/init/seed', { method: 'POST' }); expect(res.status).toBe(200); const data = (await res.json()) as { portal_templates: { created: string[]; existing: string[] } }; expect(data.portal_templates.existing).toContain('triplet'); expect(data.portal_templates.created).not.toContain('triplet'); }); it('POST /init/seed — triplet 缺 → 自動補建(新實例首次 seed)', async () => { for (const name of ['portal_user', 'portal_library']) { fetchMock .get(KBDB) .intercept({ path: `/templates/${name}`, method: 'GET' }) .reply(200, { success: true, template: { id: `tpl-${name}`, name } }); } fetchMock .get(KBDB) .intercept({ path: '/templates/triplet', method: 'GET' }) .reply(404, { success: false, error: 'template not found: triplet' }); fetchMock .get(KBDB) .intercept({ path: '/templates', method: 'POST' }) .reply(200, { success: true, template: { id: 'tpl-triplet-new', name: 'triplet' } }); const res = await SELF.fetch('http://localhost/init/seed', { method: 'POST' }); expect(res.status).toBe(200); const data = (await res.json()) as { portal_templates: { created: string[]; existing: string[] } }; expect(data.portal_templates.created).toContain('triplet'); expect(data.portal_templates.existing).not.toContain('triplet'); }); }); // ═══════════════ D61:舊實例登入自癒(搬進新家)═══════════════ // // 🔴 放在檔案最後、用**專屬 email**(不與上面任何一則共用):portal-auth-store.ts 的 // per-isolate overlay 是模組級全域變數,寫入一旦成功就會留在同一支測試檔案的後續測試裡 // (見 mockAuthStoreWrite 檔頭的長註解)。這裡就是要驗證那次「留下」,所以刻意隔離在最後, // 不會有更後面的測試共用這個 email 而被污染。 describe('D61:舊實例登入自癒(帳號只在 KBDB,登入成功後 best-effort 搬進認證儲存)', () => { const LEGACY_EMAIL = 'legacy-promote@example.com'; it('登入成功;promoteLegacyUser 把這筆帳號寫進認證儲存(一片、含正確 email/hash)', async () => { mockHeadLookup(LEGACY_EMAIL, 'rec_legacy_1'); mockGetRecord('rec_legacy_1', activeUserValues({ email: LEGACY_EMAIL })); const { puts } = mockAuthStoreWrite(); const res = await json('POST', '/portal/login', { email: LEGACY_EMAIL, password: PASSWORD }); expect(res.status).toBe(200); const data = (await res.json()) as { success: boolean }; expect(data.success).toBe(true); const shards = puts(); expect(shards.length).toBe(1); expect(shards[0].name).toBe('ARCRUN_AUTH_STORE'); const shard = JSON.parse(shards[0].text) as { users: Array<{ email: string; password_hash: string }> }; const promoted = shard.users.find((u) => u.email === LEGACY_EMAIL); expect(promoted).toBeDefined(); expect(promoted!.password_hash).toBe(storedHash); // 原樣搬過去,不重新雜湊 }); it('若新家寫入路徑未就緒(缺 CF_SECRETS_API_TOKEN),照樣登入成功——搬不動不擋門', async () => { // 直接呼叫 router、帶一份缺寫入路徑的 env(health.test.ts 已有的直呼叫慣例), // 證明 promoteLegacyUser 的失敗被 best-effort 吞掉,不影響登入本身。 const email = 'legacy-promote-writeless@example.com'; mockHeadLookup(email, 'rec_legacy_2'); mockGetRecord('rec_legacy_2', activeUserValues({ email })); const fakeEnv = { ...env, CF_SECRETS_API_TOKEN: undefined, CF_ACCOUNT_ID: undefined } as unknown as Bindings; const res = await portalRouter.fetch( new Request('http://localhost/portal/login', { method: 'POST', headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' }, body: JSON.stringify({ email, password: PASSWORD }), }), fakeEnv, {} as ExecutionContext, ); expect(res.status).toBe(200); const data = (await res.json()) as { success: boolean }; expect(data.success).toBe(true); // 沒掛 CF API mock:若程式碼真的嘗試網呼叫且被 disableNetConnect 擋下,錯誤仍會被 // best-effort 吞掉(不影響上面的 200 斷言);若程式碼正確地在 authStoreWritable() 檢查 // 就提前短路,則根本不會嘗試呼叫——兩種情況這裡都驗不出差異,差異由 afterEach 的 // assertNoPendingInterceptors 間接把關(沒有殘留 mock 代表沒有意外多打的請求)。 }); }); // ═══════════════ D62 + arcrun-rag#66(2026-08-10)═══════════════ // // ⚠️ 順序刻意:這兩個 describe 放在檔案最後,而且「D62」在前、「#66」在後。 // 原因=#66 那組會**故意把 per-isolate overlay 灌成一份沒有任何帳號的資料**(模擬傳播空窗), // 而 overlay 是模組級全域變數、不隨 test 重置(見 mockAuthStoreWrite 檔頭長註解)。 // 任何需要「認證儲存裡有帳號」的測試都不能排在它後面。 describe('D62:改密碼與忘記密碼是同一個機制(同一支端點、同一條寫入路徑)', () => { const D62_EMAIL = 'd62-reset@example.com'; it('/portal/password/change 帶 reset_token:**不需要登入、不需要現有密碼**,且票用完即失效', async () => { // 直接把一張票種進 KV(等同 /portal/password/forgot 發出來的那張), // 存的是 token 的 sha256——KV 裡看不到可用的連結。 const { sha256Hex } = await import('../src/lib/portal-auth'); const token = 'a1b2c3d4e5f60718293a4b5c6d7e8f90a1b2c3d4e5f60718293a4b5c6d7e8f90'; const recordId = `${AUTH_ID_PREFIX}d62test000000000000000`; await env.SESSIONS_KV.put( `portal_pwreset:${await sha256Hex(token)}`, JSON.stringify({ record_id: recordId, email: D62_EMAIL, created_at: new Date().toISOString() }), ); // 票有效時,先「看一眼」不會消耗它 const peek = await json('GET', `/portal/password/reset?token=${token}`); expect(peek.status).toBe(200); expect((await peek.json() as { valid: boolean; email: string }).email).toBe(D62_EMAIL); // 認證儲存裡沒有這個 record_id → 覆蓋密碼會失敗,但**票必須已經被消耗**(先刪再回) const used = await json('POST', '/portal/password/change', { reset_token: token, new: 'brand-new-pw-1' }); expect(used.status).not.toBe(200); // 這個 record 不存在,寫入失敗是預期的 // 關鍵斷言:同一條連結**不能再用第二次** const again = await json('POST', '/portal/password/change', { reset_token: token, new: 'second-try-pw-1' }); expect(again.status).toBe(400); expect((await again.json() as { code: string }).code).toBe('reset_token_invalid'); // 而且票在 KV 裡真的沒了 expect(await env.SESSIONS_KV.get(`portal_pwreset:${await sha256Hex(token)}`)).toBeNull(); }); it('亂猜的 token / 格式不對的 token → 400,不洩漏任何東西', async () => { for (const t of ['deadbeef'.repeat(8), 'not-hex-at-all', '']) { const res = await json('GET', `/portal/password/reset?token=${t}`); expect(res.status).toBe(400); expect((await res.json() as { valid: boolean }).valid).toBe(false); } }); it('沒帶 reset_token 又沒登入 → 401(修改密碼那一格仍然要身分)', async () => { const res = await json('POST', '/portal/password/change', { current: 'x', new: 'brand-new-pw-1' }); expect(res.status).toBe(401); }); it('新密碼太短 → 400(兩條路共用同一組驗證)', async () => { const res = await json('POST', '/portal/password/change', { reset_token: 'a'.repeat(64), new: 'short' }); expect(res.status).toBe(400); }); it('/portal/password/forgot:沒設代寄服務 → 誠實回 503,不假裝信寄出去了', async () => { const res = await json('POST', '/portal/password/forgot', { email: D62_EMAIL }); expect(res.status).toBe(503); expect((await res.json() as { code: string }).code).toBe('mail_relay_not_configured'); }); }); describe('arcrun-rag#66:傳播空窗期不可以銷毀 session', () => { const TOKEN_A = 'sess-token-66-propagating'; const TOKEN_B = 'sess-token-66-really-gone'; const MISSING = `${AUTH_ID_PREFIX}notinstore0000000000000`; it('正在傳播(加速器 key 還在)+讀不到 record → 503 auth_store_propagating,且 **session 沒被刪**', async () => { await seedPortalSession(TOKEN_A, MISSING); // 加速器 key 存在=「剛剛有人動過認證儲存」=現在是傳播空窗 await env.SESSIONS_KV.put( 'auth_store_recent', JSON.stringify({ written_at: Date.now() + 10_000_000, data: { version: 1, console: null, users: [] } }), ); const res = await json('GET', '/portal/session', undefined, { Authorization: `Bearer ${TOKEN_A}` }); expect(res.status).toBe(503); expect((await res.json() as { code: string }).code).toBe('auth_store_propagating'); // 🔴 這是整張票的重點:舊碼會在這裡把 KV 那筆刪掉,等 secret 鋪開也回不來 expect(await env.SESSIONS_KV.get(`portal_sess:${TOKEN_A}`)).not.toBeNull(); }); it('不在傳播空窗(加速器 key 不存在)+讀不到 record → 401 擋下,但**仍然不刪 session**', async () => { await seedPortalSession(TOKEN_B, MISSING); await env.SESSIONS_KV.delete('auth_store_recent'); const res = await json('GET', '/portal/session', undefined, { Authorization: `Bearer ${TOKEN_B}` }); expect(res.status).toBe(401); // 刪 session 是 best-effort 清潔工,而它清掉的是使用者唯一的憑據;KV 的 TTL 本來就會回收 expect(await env.SESSIONS_KV.get(`portal_sess:${TOKEN_B}`)).not.toBeNull(); }); it('session 內容本身壞掉(不是讀不到)→ 401 且**該刪**(確定的事實,不是暫時性)', async () => { await env.SESSIONS_KV.put('portal_sess:broken-66', 'not-json-at-all'); const res = await json('GET', '/portal/session', undefined, { Authorization: 'Bearer broken-66' }); expect(res.status).toBe(401); expect(await env.SESSIONS_KV.get('portal_sess:broken-66')).toBeNull(); }); });