fix(kbdb): DELETE /entries/:id 向量刪除改同步＋誠實回報（arcrun-rag#46）

舊版把向量刪除包成 fire-and-forget（waitUntil(...).catch(()=>{})）——失敗被靜默
吞掉，呼叫端（rag_takedown_direct workflow／未來的 portal 刪除 UI）永遠不知道
向量沒清乾淨。與同檔 /entries/deprecate-by-library（同步 await + 回報
vectors_deleted）的做法不一致，補齊同款誠實回報：回應加 vector_deleted
(true/false/null)，D1 本體刪除不因向量失敗而被擋下。

補上這支端點原本零覆蓋的測試（entries-delete.test.ts，3 案：模組未開／
向量刪除成功／向量刪除失敗）。

隨附 live e2e 驗證（youlin stage，4 筆測試知識，含批次 3 筆）：刪除後
keyword/semantic 混合檢索與 rag_chat AI 問答皆不再讀到已刪內容，控制組
（未刪的既有知識）不受影響——確認端到端「刪除即在所有查詢路徑消失」成立，
細節見 Leo/arcrun-rag#46 留言。

kbdb/src/routes/entries.ts

@@ -380,11 +380,26 @@ entryRoutes.patch('/:id', async (c) => {
 });
 
 // DELETE /entries/:id
+//
+// 🔴 2026-08-10（arcrun-rag#46「刪掉的知識搜尋還撈得到」第 4 點：中途失敗要看得出來）：
+//   舊版把向量刪除包成 fire-and-forget（`waitUntil(...).catch(()=>{})`）——失敗被靜默吞掉，
+//   呼叫端（rag_takedown_direct workflow／未來的 portal 刪除 UI）永遠不知道向量沒清乾淨，
+//   使用者看到「刪除成功」，但語意搜尋可能還留著殘影，直到下次搜尋命中它才被自癒清掉
+//   （search 路徑的 orphan 清理是事後補救，不是保證）。
+//   改法：與同檔 `/entries/deprecate-by-library`（見上）同款——**同步 await 再回應**，
+//   誠實回報 `vector_deleted`（true=清了／false=清失敗，D1 仍照刪／null=模組未開，不適用）。
+//   D1 刪除永遠執行到底（entry 本體一定會消失），差別只在向量那一步呼叫端看不看得見失敗。
 entryRoutes.delete('/:id', async (c) => {
-  // 模組開 → 連帶刪向量（避免孤兒向量）。失敗不致命。
+  const id = c.req.param('id');
+  let vector_deleted: boolean | null = null; // 模組未開＝不適用，維持 null 誠實表達「這件事沒發生過」
   if (embedEnabled(c.env)) {
-    c.executionCtx.waitUntil(c.env.VECTORIZE!.deleteByIds([c.req.param('id')]).then(() => {}).catch(() => {}));
+    try {
+      await c.env.VECTORIZE!.deleteByIds([id]);
+      vector_deleted = true;
+    } catch {
+      vector_deleted = false; // 誠實回 false，不假裝清乾淨了；D1 本體仍照刪，不因向量失敗而擋下
+    }
   }
-  await deleteEntry(c.env.DB, c.req.param('id'));
+  await deleteEntry(c.env.DB, id);
-  return c.json({ success: true });
+  return c.json({ success: true, vector_deleted });
 });

kbdb/tests/entries-delete.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+// arcrun-rag#46「刪掉的知識搜尋還撈得到」第 4 點：中途失敗要看得出來。
+//
+// DELETE /entries/:id 舊版把向量刪除包成 fire-and-forget（waitUntil(...).catch(()=>{})）——
+// 呼叫端完全看不到向量清除是否成功。本測試鎖住新行為：同步 await＋回應帶 vector_deleted，
+// 且無論向量刪除成功或失敗，D1 本體都要真的被刪掉（不因向量失敗而擋下本體刪除）。
+//
+// 測試手法同 search-deprecated-filter.test.ts：fake D1 捕捉 SQL 形狀；mock VECTORIZE 可控
+// deleteByIds 成功/失敗，驗證 route 層如何把結果誠實透傳給呼叫端。
+import { describe, it, expect } from 'vitest';
+import { Hono } from 'hono';
+import { entryRoutes } from '../src/routes/entries';
+import type { Bindings } from '../src/types';
+
+interface Captured { sql: string; params: unknown[] }
+
+function makeCaptureDB(captured: Captured[]) {
+  const prepare = (sql: string) => {
+    const rec: Captured = { sql, params: [] };
+    captured.push(rec);
+    const stmt = {
+      bind(...args: unknown[]) { rec.params = args; return stmt; },
+      async all<T>() { return { results: [] as T[] }; },
+      async first<T>() { return null as unknown as T; },
+      async run() { return { success: true }; },
+    };
+    return stmt;
+  };
+  return { prepare } as unknown as D1Database;
+}
+
+function makeApp(captured: Captured[], extraEnv: Record<string, unknown> = {}) {
+  const app = new Hono<{ Bindings: Bindings }>();
+  app.route('/entries', entryRoutes);
+  const env = { DB: makeCaptureDB(captured), ENVIRONMENT: 'test', ...extraEnv } as unknown as Bindings;
+  return { app, env };
+}
+
+describe('arcrun-rag#46 — DELETE /entries/:id 失敗可見性', () => {
+  it('embed 模組未開 → vector_deleted:null（不適用，非「清成功了」的謊）＋ D1 仍照刪', async () => {
+    const captured: Captured[] = [];
+    const { app, env } = makeApp(captured); // 無 VECTORIZE/AI
+    const res = await app.request('/entries/e123', { method: 'DELETE' }, env);
+    expect(res.status).toBe(200);
+    const body = (await res.json()) as { success: boolean; vector_deleted: boolean | null };
+    expect(body.success).toBe(true);
+    expect(body.vector_deleted).toBe(null);
+    expect(captured.some((c) => c.sql.includes('DELETE FROM entries WHERE id = ?'))).toBe(true);
+  });
+
+  it('模組開＋向量刪除成功 → vector_deleted:true（同步等到結果才回應，不是猜的）', async () => {
+    const captured: Captured[] = [];
+    const deletedIds: string[][] = [];
+    const { app, env } = makeApp(captured, {
+      VECTORIZE: {
+        async deleteByIds(ids: string[]) { deletedIds.push(ids); return { count: ids.length }; },
+      },
+      AI: { async run() { return { data: [[0.1]] }; } },
+    });
+    const res = await app.request('/entries/e123', { method: 'DELETE' }, env);
+    const body = (await res.json()) as { success: boolean; vector_deleted: boolean | null };
+    expect(body.success).toBe(true);
+    expect(body.vector_deleted).toBe(true);
+    expect(deletedIds).toEqual([['e123']]); // 真的呼叫了、帶對 id，不是没做就回真
+  });
+
+  it('🔴 模組開＋向量刪除失敗 → vector_deleted:false 誠實回報，且 D1 本體仍真的刪掉', async () => {
+    const captured: Captured[] = [];
+    const { app, env } = makeApp(captured, {
+      VECTORIZE: {
+        async deleteByIds() { throw new Error('Vectorize 503（模擬故障）'); },
+      },
+      AI: { async run() { return { data: [[0.1]] }; } },
+    });
+    const res = await app.request('/entries/e123', { method: 'DELETE' }, env);
+    // 舊版這裡的失敗會被 waitUntil(...).catch(()=>{}) 吞掉、caller 永遠看不到；
+    // 新版：HTTP 仍是 200（D1 本體真的刪了，這件事沒有失敗），但誠實標出向量那一步失敗了。
+    expect(res.status).toBe(200);
+    const body = (await res.json()) as { success: boolean; vector_deleted: boolean | null };
+    expect(body.success).toBe(true);
+    expect(body.vector_deleted).toBe(false);
+    // D1 本體不因向量失敗而被擋下——刪除的「本體一定會消失」承諾不打折扣。
+    expect(captured.some((c) => c.sql.includes('DELETE FROM entries WHERE id = ?'))).toBe(true);
+  });
+});